Nevada Supreme Court issues 3 opinions

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

In re Application of Shin - The Court holds that NRS 179.245(5), which prohibits Nevada courts from sealing records concerning sexually based offenses, does not improperly impinge upon the power of the State Board of Pardons Commissioners to issue pardons.  Although the Pardons' Board has expansive powers, it does not have the power to remove the historic fact that a conviction occurred and it cannot bequeath innocence.  A pardon is an act of forgiveness that restores civil rights and removes most legal consequences of a criminal conviction, but there is no right to expunge a criminal record in the absence of legislative authority.  The opinion includes a lengthy discussion of the authority of the Pardons Board.

Mack v. Estate of Mack - The Court holds that (1) it may take judicial notice of the outcome of proceedings in which one spouse was adjudged to have murdered the other; (2) a nunc pro tunc order was properly entered to memorialize a judge's oral orders; (3) the district court properly issued a Qualified Domestic Relations Order during the deceased's spouse's lifetime; and (4) Nevada's slayer statute is not preempted by ERISA.

Terracon Consultants v. Mandalay Bay - The Court answers a certified question, pursuant to NRAP 5, regarding the scope of Nevada's economic loss doctrine. 


0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Nevada Supreme Court issues 3 opinions.

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by JoNell published on March 26, 2009 10:14 AM.

US Supreme Court issues 2 opinions was the previous entry in this blog.

This Week is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.0