Nevada Supreme Court issues 2 opinions

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Ramet v. State - The State may not introduce evidence of a defendant's refusal to consent to a search of his home, and the prosecutor may not comment about the refusal to consent, but the evidence is harmless under the facts of this case.

Rivera v. Philip Morris, Inc. - NRAP 5 certification re: whether Nevada law recognizes a heeding presumption in strict product liability failure-to-warn cases.


0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Nevada Supreme Court issues 2 opinions.

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by JoNell published on June 4, 2009 9:54 AM.

Next week (June 1-5) was the previous entry in this blog.

In the news is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.0