Nevada Supreme Court finds counsel needed for post-conviction case

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
In an unpublished order, Smith v. State, the Nevada Supreme Court finds that the district court abused its discretion in failing to appoint counsel to represent a petitioner for his post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus.  This is a recurring problem in the Eighth Judicial District as Clark County judges seldom appoint counsel for post-conviction proceedings.  In contrast, counsel is routinely appointed in Washoe County and the rural counties.

Categories

,

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Nevada Supreme Court finds counsel needed for post-conviction case.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://ranchocabron.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/167

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by JoNell published on September 10, 2009 9:33 AM.

Oral argument calendar: Sept. 10 & 11 was the previous entry in this blog.

This and That is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.0