Nevada Supreme Court issues 3 opinion

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

In Foster v. Dingwall, the Nevada Supreme Court clarifies the procedure set forth in Honeycutt v. Honeycutt, which concerns NRCP 60(b)(2) motions.  The filing of a notice of appeal does not toll the time for a NRCP 60(b) motion.

The Court also issued a second opinion in Foster v. Dingwall, which concerns the strikingo of a pleading as a discovery sanction and the burden of proof for an NRCP 55(b) prove-up hearing to establish a default.

The Court issued an opinion in NAIW v. Nevada Self-Insurers Association.  It addresses NRS 616C.110 and whether activities of daily living are proper considerations in workers' comp. actions.

 

I have a brief due today, so you're on your own for reading these.  If anyone sees anything with application to criminal cases, please let me know.

Categories

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Nevada Supreme Court issues 3 opinion.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://ranchocabron.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/232

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by JoNell published on February 25, 2010 11:25 AM.

Supreme Court issues opinion on Edwards & custody was the previous entry in this blog.

9th Circuit finds bad Miranda warnings and an involuntary confession is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.0